You should check out counter strike hacks and even call of duty 4 hacks but definitely battlefield 2 hacks at MSXSecurity

Archive for October, 2006

Letterman vs. O’Reilly…Round Two

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

David Letterman didn’t try to hide the fact last night that he just plain doesn’t like Bill O’Reilly. He wasted no time bashing FOX News and doing what few people can do — ridiculing O’Reillys ratings (Letterman’s audience is more than 2x as large .) While sparring over Iraq, Letterman interrupted the giant talking head saying he “doesn’t care” what Bill has to say. When Bill O, in typical FAUX form, tried to suggest that Dave believes “Bush is an evil liar” and that “America is a bad country” Letterman comes back with the line of the month:

“You’re trying to put words in my mouth just the way you put artificial facts in your head.”

Of course, my favorite part of the debate was when O’Reilly asked Letterman “Do you want to win in Iraq,” Letterman paused and O’Reilly came back and said “it’s a simple question,” and Letterman fired back, “no it’s not because I’m thoughtful.” Classic!

See, this is what happens to O’Reilly when he doesn’t control the mic–he gets his silly ass kicked.

The Fight Against Hate Mail

Friday, October 27th, 2006

The recent flap in Vancouver regarding the refusal of unionized postal workers to deliver hate mail has been resolved. The hate mail will be delivered by Monday, as promised in it’s three business days commitment.

The incident began when unionized postal workers in East Vancouver walked off the job Thursday morning after refusing to deliver a publication called “The Prophetic Word”, published by Ontario-based Baptist Fundamentalists. The decision not to deliver the mail was based on a headline which read that AIDS are the “consequences of the sin of homosexuality.”

But Canada Post refuses to cease delivery of the hate literature, saying “we don’t censor the mail. We cannot.” Federal NDP MP for Vancouver East Libby Davies said she received an unusually high number of calls and emails from constituents who were offended that CP was distributing the booklet. Ms.Davies pointed out that if radio or television would not broadcast such an opinion, why the mail? There is now the question whether the proliferation of the material does qualify as “hate literature” and not covered under the terms of freedom of speech.

I won’t deny that people have the right to express their views, but are we as a people who pay taxes for the government to deliver our mail, obligated to support the transfer of literature that clearly states an erroneous and misleading statement? That homosexuals have somehow disobeyed God and deserve to die a horrible death of AIDS? As though that were somehow a punishment God came up with for gays.

I wonder how quickly CP would cease delivery if the headlines were based on peoples of more significant demographics:

“All Muslims worship Osama bin Laden as a father”
“There is a Zionist conspiracy to perpetrate the holocaust myth”
“Medical evidence shows that blacks are inferior to whites”